@@ 49,7 49,7 @@ tracker](https://todo.sr.ht/~icefox/oora
thorough 3rd party investigation into them, though it apparently
passes [Dr. Lemire's tests](https://github.com/lemire/testingRNG).
So for now I personally consider WyRand to be in the "trust but
- verify" level of quality. It's probably fine.
+ verify" level of quality. It's probably fine. Check back in 2027.
* `fastrand` -- Looks fine, uses the same algorithm as `oorandom`.
Made by the same people as the `smol` async runtime, which may be
good or bad for you. Does slightly more than `oorandom` does, which